The 30 Unanswered Questions We Sent to Charissa Tenorio on March 21


It was March 21, 2025. Charissa Tenorio and Frankie Rosalin were in the throes of public scrutiny surrounding Mr. Rosalin’s alleged workplace violence incident against seaport general manager Rory Respicio. Just one day after the now-celebrated “Tyler” and “Pat” told the public about the federal investigation into Ms. Tenorio, her brother’s boyfriend Matthew Topasna, and others. No more than a week before Lieutenant Governor Joshua Tenorio’s aunt, a government director of an agency in control of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds, took to a WhatsApp group chat for cabinet members to discredit Kandit’s coverage about her niece, her nephew’s boyfriend, and the two witnesses who blew the whistle.

But on March 21, 2025, more than three months before she would be indicted with seven others, all Kandit had was factual knowledge of two Federal Bureau of Investigation raids against Ms. Tenorio (Criminal Search Warrants MJ-24-00095 and MJ-24-00096), the on-the-record testimony of two witnesses whose voices had to be modulated for their safety, and information from sources who were too scared to go on the record. On that day, at 2:42 p.m., we sent Ms. Tenorio a WhatsApp message, which turned double-blue checkmarks within seconds, indicating she had opened the chat and seen at least part of the message containing 30 questions about the investigation.

Here is that message – with those 30 questions, which the now-indicted sister of Lieutenant Governor Joshua Tenorio never answered:

Hi Charissa,
There’s been a lot of discussion surrounding allegations involving you, Frankie Rosalin, the Lieutenant Governor, and Matt. Last night, I interviewed two individuals who have chosen to go public, saying they believe “enough is enough.” They claim that fraud and corruption have hurt real people—including the poor and the homeless.
I want to give you the opportunity to respond to the following questions:
1.Are you aware of these allegations, and what is your response?
2.Do you, or any of your family members, including the Lieutenant Governor, have any involvement in the actions being described?
3.Have you been contacted by law enforcement regarding these claims?
4.Can you confirm or deny that two search warrants were served on you in August of last year?
5.Who served them, and what exactly were they looking for?
6.What was seized—phones, laptops, documents, burner devices, financial records?
7.Have you been charged with any crimes as a result of those warrants?
8.Were the warrants tied to the PUA fraud scheme or the falsified employment documents used to secure loans at Coast360?
9.Have you voluntarily turned over your devices or was everything seized by force?
10.Have you been contacted by the FBI regarding these warrants or any related allegations? If so, when?
11.What is your response to claims that you falsified employment documents so individuals could obtain loans—and give you all or most of the proceeds of those loans?
12.How many of those fake verifications were tied to businesses that don’t exist or that you controlled behind the scenes?
13.How many PUA applications did you personally orchestrate, prepare, or assist in filing on behalf of people who were not eligible?
14.How much of that pandemic relief money ended up in your possession?
15.Did you or your immediate family—your mother, your children, your nephews—receive any federal pandemic relief funds, GEDA money, or emergency rental assistance under questionable or false circumstances?
16.Were you involved in submitting forged rental agreements, fake eviction notices, or false unemployment claims to access ERA program funds?
17.Did you coordinate with GovGuam employees to get these fraudulent ERA applications approved?
18.Sources allege you arranged for people to be hired into GovGuam agencies in exchange for repayment of personal debts or financial favors. Is that true?
19.Who inside the government helped you push these hires through?
20.Did you play any role in inflating applicant scores or altering qualification rankings to ensure these hires were selected over more qualified candidates?
21.Are the allegations true that you participated in bid rigging involving DPW or GDOE?
22.Who were your contacts inside those agencies, and how were the bids manipulated?
23.Did you or any close associates financially benefit from contracts awarded through these allegedly rigged processes?
24.Did the Lieutenant Governor receive special treatment from GPA to delay payment on his power bill, as alleged by witnesses?
25.Are you or any of your family members currently receiving public assistance?
26.Have you had any meetings with the Governor regarding your legal and political troubles—or your brother’s?
27.Do you know whether the Lieutenant Governor plans to resign or if the Governor has asked him to step down?
28.Would you be willing to release documentation or records to disprove these allegations publicly?
29.Do you believe these accusations are politically motivated or part of a broader agenda?
30.And finally—if you are innocent—why have so many people, including people close to you, come forward to tell their stories? Are they all lying?

For background on this case, which was formed by grand jury indictment in the U.S. District Court of Guam Wednesday, and unsealed Friday, see the text of Kandit’s Friday evening story below:

[By Troy Torres, Johnnie Rosario, Eric Rosario, Jacob Nakamura, and Joey San Agustin; published June 27, 2025]

Multiple members of Guam Lieutenant Governor Joshua Tenorio’s family have been indicted by a federal grand jury on an array of public corruption charges. Mr. Tenorio has denied involvement in the alleged conspiracy, and in separate statements from himself and the Office of the Governor, Adelup is asserting that Mr. Tenorio is not under federal investigation. Governor’s spokeswoman Krystal Paco-San Agustin has yet to answer Kandit’s inquiry as to whether either the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the U.S. Attorney’s Office told the governor or lieutenant governor that Mr. Tenorio was not under investigation.

Mr. Tenorio’s partner, Matthew Topasna, the lieutenant governor’s sister, Charissa Tenorio, her boyfriend, Frankie Rosalin, Mr. Rosalin’s mother, Tina Sanchez, Ms. Sanchez’s sister, Winnie Jo Santos, former Guam Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program manager Kathleen Peredo, and former Guam PUA office worker Marlene Pinaula were charged by the grand jury Wednesday. The case was unsealed Friday afternoon. All seven of the defendants now face trial on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, nine counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 counts of mail fraud, one count of federal program theft, one count of money laundering, and two counts of witness tampering.

They are accused, according to the indictment, of defrauding the federal government out of $1.9 million in federal pandemic funds meant to go to qualified Guamanians in need.

If convicted of all counts, they each face scores of years in prison. The defendants were arrested today, and according to federal court documents are to be arraigned on July 3.

The indictment confirms testimony of two witnesses Kandit interviewed and featured in March, who vouched for the federal corruption investigation, and alleged that Ms. Tenorio and Mr. Topasna were key figures in a multi-million dollar public corruption conspiracy involving federal funds.

According to the indictment, the defendants conspired to use a business owned and operated by Ms. Tenorio and Mr. Rosalin – Comfort Cutz – and a business owned by Mr. Topasna – Haute Dog & Co. – to fraudulently enrich themselves and others through the PUA program.

“Defendants and others solicited individuals in Guam to apply for pandemic unemployment benefits,” the indictment alleges. “Defendants and others falsely represented to these prospective beneficiaries that they qualified for pandemic unemployment benefits.”

The two witnesses Kandit interviewed and featured in March using aliases and modulated voices – “Tyler” and “Pat” – also alleged these crimes, and further alleged that Ms. Tenorio was the mastermind of the conspiracy.

Tyler and Pat further alleged that Ms. Tenorio swindled most of the recipients – many of whom were poor and some of whom were homeless – into giving her the vast majority of the PUA benefits they were paid by the government. Pat alleged that the conspiracy extended to employees at two local banks. Pat also alleged a bank fraud conspiracy, which is not mentioned in the current indictment.

Pat alleged that hundreds of PUA applications were processed through Mr. Topasna’s business, Haute Dog and Co. which she said was a hot dog stand that was never known to be in operation beyond a few days.

According to the indictment, Ms. Tenorio, Ms. Sanchez, and Ms. Santos provided the applications for the victims to complete, and would have the victims write in their names and sign the applications, leaving the rest blank for someone else to fill out. The prospective PUA applicants, who needed verifications of employment that would show a loss of income due to the pandemic, received falsified VOEs from Comfort Cuts that bore Mr. Rosalin’s signature.

“In fact, Comfort Cuts continued operating during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the indictment alleges. “Comfort Cuts continued to perform and receive payment for work on several Guam government contracts, including for work performed at GDOL.”

The defendants allegedly used other businesses to funnel through fraudulent PUA applications, according to the indictment. For those, “members of the conspiracy completed self-attestation forms on behalf of the applicants that made various false claims about the applicant’s work history and employment status in order to make it appear the applicant was eligible for pandemic unemployment benefits.”

The federal government alleges that the lieutenant governor’s boyfriend, Mr. Topasna, “provided letters to his employees and to individuals who had never worked for [Haute Dog & Co.] falsely claiming” that they had been employed at HDC and furloughed due to Covid-19. Mr. Topasna also “applied for pandemic unemployment benefits on his own behalf and falsely claimed that HDC never operated.”

Validating “Tyler” and “Pat’s” March 2025 testimony to Kandit, the indictment alleges that the defendants also submitted PUA applications for people who were unaware of the applications.

“Pinaula and Peredo consulted with Tenorio directly, used their access and knowledge of the HireGuam computer system to check on the fraudulent applications and in many cases, approved the fraudulent applications for payment,” the indictment states. “After the fraudulent applications were approved, the applicants began receiving benefits either through direct deposit to a specified bank account or through checks received by U.S. mail.”

Further validating the March witness statements, the federal government alleges that Ms. Tenorio, Ms. Sanchez, and Ms. Santos directed PUA recipients “to turn over half or more of the initial payment in cash to Tenorio at the Comfort Cuts office.”

In many cases, the indictment states, the three women would accompany the PUA beneficiary victims to the bank where the victims would cash the benefits checks “in order to make sure that a portion of the cash was turned over to Tenorio.”

In many cases, the indictment states, the fraudulent checks were signed over to Ms. Sanchez or Ms. Santos.

“In at least one instance, fraudulent pandemic unemployment benefits were deposited directly into a bank account Tenorio controlled,” the indictment states, which is another allegation “Pat” also made against Ms. Tenorio.

On top of the fraud involving PUA and the fact of Comfort Cuts’ continued operation during the pandemic, Comfort Cuts stopped paying the regular wages of its employees who fraudulently received PUA benefits, “and treated the pandemic unemployment benefits as if they were payment for their services.”

Ms. Pinaula, Ms. Peredo, “and others” also fraudulently completed the weekly certifications on behalf of the applicants who were unknowingly receiving illegal payments, according to the indictment. The two then-PUA program employees also allegedly held onto PUA checks, preventing them from being mailed to beneficiaries, “and instead delivered them to members of the conspiracy.”

According to “Tyler” in the March 2025 interview with Kandit, Ms. Peredo attempted to intimidate Tyler using the color of her authority and threat of an investigation into Tyler’s application for PUA if Tyler did not do as Ms. Tenorio commanded.

Out of the seven who were indicted, according to the indictment, Mr. Rosalin, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Topasna, and Ms. Santos submitted fraudulent PUA applications in their own names. At the time of the alleged conspiracy, Mr. Rosalin was the marina manager at the Port Authority of Guam, making an annual gross salary of nearly $100,000.

According to “Pat” in the March 2025 interview, Mr. Topasna conspired to cause his unqualified nephew to received PUA benefits under Haute Dog & Co. Pat also alleged that the PUA office, through Ms. Tenorio, awarded PUA benefits to a child within the Tenorio family.

The indictment details at least some of the instances of wire fraud – the movement of money through various accounts – money laundering, and mail fraud before describing alleged August 6, and August 7, 2024 incidents. According to the indictment, Ms. Tenorio and Ms. Sanchez on August 6 that year harassed a person in an attempt to “hinder, delay, prevent, and dissuade” that person from cooperating with the ongoing federal investigation.

As reported by Kandit since November of 2024, the federal investigation into Ms. Tenorio and the others kicked off in July of last year as federal agents executed search warrants on Ms. Tenorio’s properties; meaning, she was aware an investigation was happening.

On August 6 that year, according to the indictment, Ms. Tenorio allegedly harassed another person in an attempt to tamper with a witness of the investigation.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement